Tales of Wonderlost

Month

June 2013

Hi Shannon, I saw your comment on the drop box photo on FB. First of all, Im sorry about your situations. I just wanna share my side of the story. I live in a developing country with messy regulations about abortion, adoption, and related stuff. I had a maid who actually did abandon her baby because she was unwed. She stated that she wants no connection with her child. But my relative, who adopted the child kept both in contact (Anon C) - 1

After a few years, my ex maid looked for her then 6/7yo child. For money. She pointedly told my relative that she has 0 intention to get to know the child, but she just wants my relative to “buy” that child from her because she needs money back then. The child whom I like to refer to as my cousin, was deeply hurt. So the way I see it, instead of forcing a mother who refuse to have connection with the child to keep the child, it’s less hurtful to leave the child with someone caring. 

Finally, I want to clarify that I fully respect your opinions on the drop box. I just hope maybe you can take a look at it from another perspective. I feel that the idea of this is not to cut the ties between mothers and babies, but to give a new hope for ashamed mothers to live a new life, and for the babies to not… at least not sold? Or die in the cold… Sorry again if I offend you in any ways. (Anon C) - 3

sigh. where do i begin. this is an old message that i got when a bunch of people were messaging me about the baby box. i’m just getting around to answering, but i do hope this person is still reading.

i have never stated that women should be forced to raise children that they don’t want to raise. i do believe that mothers should have the right to choose adoption. but i have written time and again about how this word “choice” is a tricky one.

i have also never said that i think the purpose of the baby box is to cut ties between mothers and their children. HOWEVER, whether or not that is the goal is not relevant because that is what it DOES. let me repeat that, regardless of the purpose - in reality, that is EXACTLY what it does. as to your suggestion that the baby box gives “a new hope for ashamed mothers to live a new life” - i saw i’m all for mothers having the right to live a new life without shame. but that right DOES NOT and will never trump the child’s basic right to their birth information. PERIOD. the baby box takes that right away from the child. PERIOD. mothers who choose adoption should by all means have the chance to live without shame - after they fulfill the proper requirements to ensure an ethical adoption for their child. that is a minimum requirement, people. 

as to your suggestion that if not for the babybox, the child would get sold or die in the cold, i say 1) what do you think adoption agencies are doing when they send children for adoption? do you think they are doing it out of the kindness of their hearts for free? adoption agencies have a history of exploiting vulnerable families in order to send children for adoption. they also have a history of negligently sending children who were lost (not orphans) and/or purposefully falsifying records in order to make children orphans so they could send for adoption. now, why do you think they do that? here’s a list of salaries for adoption agency executives. now tell me that those babies are not being sold. 2) the idea that if not for the babybox, i’ve written about it before here, but i’ll say it again: mothers who leave their children in a babybox clearly exhibit that they understand that abandoning babies on the road to die is wrong by the very fact that they’ve chosen to go to the babybox and not abandon in the street. assuming that if the babybox was not there, they would abandon them on the side of the road is faulty logic. by the same logic alone, it is just as reasonable to assume that if the babybox was not there, they would go one step further (not one step back) and ensure the baby is adopted ethically (which the babybox does not allow for). having worked extensively with unwed mothers in korea (as well as women who lost their children by adoption - almost always through coercion or force) i can say with confidence that the babybox simply provides a moral grey space for mothers who would otherwise give up for ethical adoption or choose to raise their child (if economic and social support were available). even worse, creates a situation (like mine), when people who are not the mother (or father) can give up for adoption. 

Jun 19, 20134 notes
#asks #Anonymous #babybox
So I was browsing through my dash and I came upon --> post/53304105518/cupcakesandrocketships-casting-appreciation .... I feel like I should be angry at what they're saying but I'm not sure, guess I just wanted your opinion on it? All I could think of was "couldn't they hold auditions for the role as well?"

ummm sorry, i have no idea what this is about? was something supposed to come up when i copy and pasted that?

ETA: ok i found it here. ummm yea because two actors declined it apparently that means they tried hard enough. typical ridiculous justification from people who want to defend whitewashing. because clearly there are only two men of the correct ethnicity IN THE ENTIRE WORLD who could play that role. what a joke. of course they could’ve held auditions and made real effort to find an actor of that ethnicity in order to properly represent the character. and of course they would’ve found someone perfectly capable to play the part. but they didn’t make the effort. and the public accepts it and even if there is an outcry, most of the general public will be like the idiot from the link you sent and defend this ridiculous whitewashing.

Jun 19, 2013
#Anonymous #asks
10 Signs that Feminism May Not Be For You → theoutliercollective.wordpress.com

some of the highlights…

2. You think that one of the goals of the feminist movement should be to make men feel safer or more comfortable about feminism…

5. You’re not interested in hearing how women of colour, queer women, or trans* women feel that the feminist movement has failed to recognize or address their needs and wants.

7. You ever, ever, ever feel the need to clarify that you’re not one of those feminists….

(via thegrandnarrative)

Jun 19, 20135 notes

oh my gooooooood. i am a genius. i fixed it. I FIXED IT! it only took me two hours but i motherfucking fixed it. jinwoo the engineer couldn’t fix it but I FIXED IT~~ (to be fair, he wasn’t really that invested in fixing it) 

Jun 19, 20134 notes

meandthecitylights replied to your post: now the bluetooth itself is not even showing up in…

Google search the problem. I’ve solved a lot of Macbook issues this way.

yea that’s what i’ve been doing for the past hour and a half (i certainly didn’t come up with the paper-folding and other ideas, i’m not that creative!) i hate everything.

Jun 19, 2013
#meandthecitylights #replies

now the bluetooth itself is not even showing up in the system preferences menu. what the fuuuuck.

Jun 19, 20131 note

whyyyyy does my mouse hate me? why does it never work. i bought brand new batteries, still no go. i carefully fit paper inside it because after an internet search people said the batteries are too small. no dice. apple i hate you. really. just wasted like an hour that i should’ve been editing my thesis. still doesn’t work.

Jun 19, 20132 notes
that pic of you, your sister, and your fiancee is so cute

you mean this one? can’t argue with you there! thanks~ hehe^^

Jun 19, 20132 notes
#me #anon #asks #jinwoo #ladyfaceshai
Jun 19, 201319 notes
#me #jinwoo
wow, that anon really wants you to make them feel better about white people being racist

that and they also seem to want me to justify their racism as an asian person against black and latina american people. not happening here, friends.

Jun 19, 20134 notes
What you call institutional racism is merely economics. Koreans, Japanese, and Chinese do the same. They favor their own. But the whites are the most effective because they do it globally so they are much bigger and powerful because of it. So you are trying to convince people that they shouldn't do this because it's unfair to nonwhites? Everyone is looking out for themselves especially when it comes to money. Why should they stop? If you were in their shoes, you would do the same.

1) no, it is not merely econonics or wealthy poc wouldn’t face racism but they do. the potus (supposedly the most powerful person in the world) faces racism every day and i’m quite sure it has nothing to do with economics.

2) “other people do it too” is not an acceptable reason for doing or participating in something that is wrong. nor is it an acceptable excuse or justification.

3) korea, japan, and china may have discriminatory policies/attitudes when it comes to foreigners but please don’t pretend that white supremacy doesn’t permeate and greatly affect these countries as well.

4) yes, exactly. i AM trying to convince people they should not do this because it is unfair to non-whites. they should stop because money is not more important than other people’s rights. why should they stop? they should stop because it is wrong and it oppresses other people. is there any better reason?

5) no. no, i wouldn’t.

ETA: if i was white it would probably be harder for me to realize my privilege because i would probably have been raised to take it for granted. but i have confidence in myself as a decent human being that i would not do the same. i know it’s possible (though no one is perfect and no one can completely escape white supremacy) because i have white friends who don’t live like that, thanks to their sincere and continued efforts to be aware of their own privilege, how it is part of a larger system and how that system benefits them and oppresses others.

Jun 19, 201312 notes
#anon #asks
My point is that black and hispanic racism towards asians are a lot worse than whites towards asians when you are a kid. As an adult, it might be other way around but I don't know because I refuse to live where there isn't a big asian community anymore. If you grow up with bunch rednecks, then I could see why you would think the way you do. I'm just saying that blacks and hispanics are no better, but you seem to think that they are some innocent victims.

there is also plenty of anti-blackness in the asian american community. what is your point? we are all members of oppressed groups in the system of white supremacy.

personal aggressions (which can often lead to tragic results) can still not be compared to institutionalized racism. especially when those personal aggressions are borne out of that system. i will not deny the negative forms it can take, but it is not the same. i am not talking about white people being “bad” and black and latina american people being “innocent”. i am talking about a system which was designed and continues to operate in order to keep white people in power and oppress people of color.

Jun 19, 201312 notes
#asks #anon
on pointe: Dear Troy → paradelle.tumblr.com

hyuninc:

image

Sorry it’s taken me so long to write you back. It’s been like what…over 10 years now. I thought of you recently because I was watching this doc “The House I Live In.” It’s about the war on drugs and how harmful it’s been, how it’s destroyed lives, ruined families, and…

Jun 19, 201341 notes
“Men who want to be feminists do not need to be given a space in feminism. They need to take the space they have in society & make it feminist.” —

Kelley Temple, National Union of Students UK Women’s Officer (via petiteperspective)

WOW. NEVER HAS ANYONE SAID IT SO WELL. OMG. i’m jealous that this isn’t a quote of me.

(via carmenrios)

Reminds me of zee beach houses.

(via haventtoldyoueverything)

Jun 19, 201316,067 notes
Play
Jun 19, 2013153 notes
Lost in Headaches: No seriously Someone tell the women who abolished 군가산점 that they were... → lostintrafficlights.tumblr.com

lostintrafficlights:

No seriously

Someone tell the women who abolished 군가산점 that they were too westernized.

Someone tell the women who fought for pregnancy leave that they were too westernized.

Someone tell the women who fought against marital rape that they were too westernized.

Someone tell the women who…

Jun 19, 201330 notes
Comfort women overcome their suffering by easing others’ pain → koreaherald.com

Kim Bok-dong (left) and Kil Won-ok attend a rally in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul on May 29. (Yonhap News) Koreans donate to women victimized by sex crimes during Vietnam War

Two Korean former sex slaves during the Japanese colonial era are raising funds to support other victims of wartime sexual violence around the world.

The so-called Butterfly Fund was formed by 87-year-old Kim Bok-dong and 84-year-old Kil Won-ok to support female victims of the Vietnam War and civil wars in Africa, the Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan said Monday. 



The fund sent $6,000 and $4,000 to 43-year-old Euguyen Ban Luang and 43-year-old Euguyen Ti Kim, respectively, last month. The sisters were victims of sexual violence committed during the Vietnam War. Their mother conceived them when she was raped by a Korean soldier.

When the Vietnam War broke out in 1965, former president Park Chung-hee sent more than 300,000 soldiers to support the U.S. military there. In regards to the suffering the deployment caused, former presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun made official apologies to Vietnam.

“The Vietnamese suffered the same pain as us. This is the first step to compensate them,” the group said.

Most Vietnamese women who were sexually violated by Korean soldiers during the war were unable to maintain a normal marriage, according to a field study conducted by the council. Their children also had lower levels of income and education.

“I experienced that pain. I know all too well how much suffering that causes,” said Kil Won-ok, who was forcibly taken by the Japanese invading army at the age of 13.

“I want to comfort women who went through the same ordeal as I did,” Kil said, explaining why she established Butterfly Fund.

Prior to receiving the fund, Luang worked as a day laborer catching shrimps. Now Luang can lease a plot of land for 30 years to farm. Kim, who lives in Hanoi, will rent a building to run a store.

Originally, the Butterfly Fund was to use financial compensation from Japan, but the Japanese government refused to provide any compensation for the wartime atrocities it committed against women during World War II. Singer Lee Hyori donated 5 million won ($4,420) as the fund’s first campaigner, and 300 organizations joined in the effort to amass over 70 million won.

“Our ladies dream of a peaceful world,” said a spokesperson of the council. “We will see to it that the funds are given to those who need them the most.”

By Lee Sang-ju

Jun 19, 201345 notes
#comfort women #sex slavery #japanese military sexual slavery
Hello, you really have interesting blog. I've read through a lot of your entries and It seems like you are trying to do the right thing by showing a lot of white prejudice. As an asian student who has attended American public schools where there was very few Asian students but many black, hispanic, and white students, you should know that blacks and hispanics were the most racists of them all. If you were called ching chong and beaten up on regular basis, this blog might be different.

i also attended american public schools. i also was ching chonged, called chink and jap and had people pull their eyes back at me (yes, on a regular basis). i may not have been beaten up but i have been alienated, threatened, harassed and violated (by, yes, white people). do i think no other minorities are guilty of racism against other minorities? of course not (by the way, i lived in memphis until i was 12, so i didn’t grow up seeing only white people). but what is your point? it’s all based on a system of white supremacy, whoever is carrying out the action.

Jun 19, 20137 notes
#anon #asks
miscellany et cetera: so... → pleonasmism.tumblr.com

pleonasmism:

If you’re a self-professed “outsider” to a culture, and know virtually nothing about the culture and its history, and don’t speak the language, and don’t actually live in the region, and have no vested interest in the outcome so that all of this is just a thought experiment to you…

…that makes…

Jun 19, 201318 notes
“You know what I love? When people don’t see my race. There is nothing more affirming for me as a person than to have essential parts of myself and my experience completely disregarded. I mean, inside we’re all the same. And there’s only one race: the HUMAN race! Amirite??? Ugh. Listen. If your ability to respect someone’s right to exist requires pretending that they are just like you, that’s a problem. We are not all the same. And things like race, gender, disability, etc. are exactly the kinds of things that shape our lives and our experiences and make us different from one another. Being different is not the problem. The idea that being the same as you is what gives us the right to exist is the problem.” —8 Ways Not To Be An “Ally”: A Non-Comprehensive List — Black Girl Dangerous (via brute-reason)
Jun 19, 201369 notes
Jun 19, 20133,093 notes
This... is White Privilege: “But everyone was racist back then! All our favorite historical... → thisiswhiteprivilege.tumblr.com

thisiswhiteprivilege:

“But everyone was racist back then! All our favorite historical figures were racist compared to today’s standards! It’s not fair to judge them based on contemporary ideas!”

Let’s debunk this favorite derailment spawned from the headcannons of the White History fandom.

1. “Everyone was racist…

Jun 19, 2013495 notes
This... is White Privilege: “Your aggression is scaring away people who would want to help... → thisiswhiteprivilege.tumblr.com

thisiswhiteprivilege:

“Your aggression is scaring away people who would want to help you!”

The war against racism will be a hard one, and white allies, real white allies, used to be willing to get attacked by the dogs, beaten up, and even lose their lives for the sake of equality. Now you’re gonna tell me that in…

Jun 19, 2013997 notes

glitterlion:

This idea that you “have” to forgive people in order to move on or whatever is complete and utter bullshit. You don’t “have” to forgive anyone in order to live a life that’s fulfilling to you.

it also puts the responsibility to “resolve” the problem on the person who was wrong or oppressed which is just fucked up!
Jun 19, 20136,450 notes
Different, Not Less: Chinese adoptees:... → kathrynjin.tumblr.com

kathrynjin:

Chinese adoptees:

  • kathrynjin.tumblr.com
  • thechinaadoptee.tumblr.com
  • chinasdreamers.tumblr.com
  • theadoptionblog.tumblr.com
  • fernclouds.tumblr.com
  • u-haul.tumblr.com
  • systematicallyspasmodic.tumblr.com
  • just-my-confessions.tumblr.com
  • jistring.tumblr.com
  • …
Jun 18, 2013132 notes
The Overwhelming Nature Of Code-Switching : NPR → npr.org

enseoulment:

Code-switching can be far from empowering, writes Matthew Salesses, who was adopted form Korea and has since found himself straddling cultures.

Props to Cathy for sending me this link.

just seeing this. again, i recommend his tumblr too - thisisnotaboutadoption.

Jun 18, 201316 notes
#thisisnotaboutadoption
Jun 18, 201352,801 notes
what are your thoughts on appropriation in sk pop culture? a lot gets said about anti-blackness, which exists, but very little is said about the relationship between the dissemination of african-american culture and american military presence in sk (and japan). people often talk like koreans just plucked american culture out of a vortex; but america also distorted korean culture through prolonged cultural and military aggression. thoughts?

oh god - i am seriously the last person that should be asked anything about k-pop among all of the tumblrs that are even remotely related to korea. i actually no close to nothing about k-pop. the closest i come is occasionally being guilty of enjoying korean audition programs and shows that bring legendary korean singers back to the stage (나는 가수다, 히든 싱어). but again, neither of those are k-pop.

ummm my thoughts are that appropriation is not good, period. though it is pervasive in pop culture around the world, south korean or otherwise. anti-blackness also exists everywhere, including korea. you are correct that the dissemination of african-american culture in sk has a lot to do with the past and continued US military presence. it also has to do with the dominance of american movies/tv throughout the world. militarization and neo-colonialism has had terrible outcomes for korea in nearly every aspect of korean society (i’m sure k-pop has also not escaped that but i can’t speak to that because i really do not know anything about k-pop). 

finally, this is not angry, but in all seriousness - people, please stop sending questions to me about k-pop. because i really don’t know. there are plenty of people having intelligent discussions about k-pop/korean media and their implications of the greater korean society (hanryu would NOT be an example of that). if that’s your thing, i’d recommend thegrandnarrative. i think there are a few more blogs out there that also provide decent discussion about korean pop culture, but i can’t remember off the top of my head… followers, any other recommendations?)

Jun 18, 20133 notes
#Anonymous #anon #asks #kpop #korea
To the annon talking about "k" netizens. Have they seen the youtube comments on anything?!!!? Especially videos regarding image and other important issues. Those are the thoughts of CITIZENS. Complete mindless hatred and ignorance.

yup. hatred and ignorance (sadly) know no national boundaries.

(in reference to this anon).

Jun 18, 20132 notes
#missmikecia #asks
as an outsider that observe k-netizen in general, the only conclusion i got is they are so close minded, love to judge (and hate), and love to jump into the conclusion without any facts. but i really don't want to judge a large group just by a little example, what is your thought of those netizen?

take the “k” out of it and just make it netizens around the world and you’re probably right about at least some of them. 

Jun 18, 20131 note
#Anonymous #anon #asks
I'm seriously tired of people trying to make gender neutral issues into women's issues

lostintrafficlights:

hanryufan:

lostintrafficlights:

hanryufan:

lostintrafficlights:

hanryufan:

lostintrafficlights:

hanryufan:

Plastic surgery is huuuuuuge in South Korea, and men and women alike get it (and men and women alike are made fun of or gossiped about over it, especially for getting too much of it). Off the top of my head I can think of several men who’ve been called “plastic surgery monsters” by Korean people, and many others still who’ve been speculated about heavily.

There’s a female artist who’s had an unhealthily large amount of surgery and clearly has a lot of issues, but instead of defending her as a human being, this person has decided that it’s misogyny. They’re trying to make it out as though the Korean public thinks they own her body and can dictate what she can and can’t do with it, when in reality they’re just expressing their opinions.

Some (clearly blind) people maintain that she’s never had any surgery, and some of those people justify that stance by saying that her boss would step in before she did anything too extreme. This person took offense to that notion, saying “because everyone knows a 30 year old should not be allowed to make decisions about their body without first consulting their male boss”. What this person fails to (or refuses to) realize is that regardless of gender, he is her boss. If it was part of her contract that she would not get plastic surgery, she would be legally obligated not to get surgery. Clearly it’s not part of her contract, but if it was it would be well within his rights as her boss to step in and tell her not to. The person claims that it’s her private life and should basically never be talked about, but she’s a celebrity entertainer; certain things are going to be talked about publicly, and her face is one of them.

The artist in question has a very ditsy and childlike image (as is quite common in South Korea, and not just for women), so it’s understandable that people would regard her a bit like a child even though she’s almost 30. She’s also very lovable, so a lot of people argue with each other and try to defend her over various things.

There’s a male artist who has also had a ton of plastic surgery, but unlike the female artist in question, he’s very public about it and has a healthy attitude about it. Tons of people still make fun of him for it and talk shit, but he just laughs along. I guess all those people talking shit and being very vocal about their opinions don’t count because he’s male though?

And as for beauty standards, men are talked about in general just as much. Men may not be bashed quite as much, since most Kpop fans are female, but they’re still bashed much more than is necessary.

This is not a feminist issue. This is not a gendered issue. This is a human issue, and you’re only making things worse for everybody involved by trying to cram it into your bullshit problematic cookie cutter that says only women can ever suffer and only men cause suffering.

What really fuckin’ pisses me off though is when people try to make a big deal out of something, and then list things that completely counteract their argument in their argument. They listed two women who don’t fall into her view of women as universal victims, who are respected for their decisions regarding their appearance… and yet somehow being respected is still impossible for women? Make up your fucking mind. Two top artists aren’t an exception to the rule, they’re part of the rule.

Awwwww look at this little pissbaby talking out of their ass

Since you clearly have nothing to counter with, why even bother replying? It just makes you look stupid and pressed.

Because it was literally not worth the rebuttal. As a Korean woman in Korea I just sort of laughed at how much of your knowledge is built on grasping at straws and making things up about Korean culture.

Stay ignorant :D

If you’re unwilling to even make an attempt, you’ve already lost. “I’m a Korean woman in Korea” is a completely worthless statement unless you’re actually willing to put your money where your mouth is and provide any kind of actual argument other than “you should believe me because I say so”.

I provided a medium length analysis of the topic (which was primarily centered around the kpop subculture); you provided insults and excuses as to why you shouldn’t have to explain yourself. Who’s really grasping at straws here?

Stay pressed :D

And that is where you’re wrong.

Korean society is not kpop. It works in completely different ways, the same ways that American pop cannot accurately reflect American society. But you are assuming that it is so in all of Korean society, sooooo…..

Now, if you want a call out? You’re getting one.

Plastic surgery is huuuuuuge in South Korea

Not as huge as you think.

Off the top of my head I can think of several men who’ve been called “plastic surgery monsters” by Korean people, and many others still who’ve been speculated about heavily.

And they’re celebrities. Same with female celebrities. However the misogyny lies in the fact that 1). the repercussions for female celebrities are more severe 2). “plastic surgery monsters” originates from making fun of women who got plastic surgery, and has evolved into a trope depicting mostly women living or frequenting Gangnam and Cheongdam, whereas for men it’s a fucking tiny percentage of the population that gets called that. There are even sites where men congregate and put up pictures of women who may or may not have had plastic surgery so they can look at them; I do not see a similar site made by women. 3). the reason why these men get ridiculed is because they are participating in something that is culturally understood as a female thing.

There’s a female artist who’s had an unhealthily large amount of surgery and clearly has a lot of issues, but instead of defending her as a human being, this person has decided that it’s misogyny. They’re trying to make it out as though the Korean public thinks they own her body and can dictate what she can and can’t do with it, when in reality they’re just expressing their opinions.

The larger issue here is that 1). body autonomy of male and female celebrities alike are not considered to belong to them by the public everywhere on the planet. 2). however in the process of dissecting and consuming said bodies in entertainment industries, women do often go through a harsher lens, which is again, misogynistic.

The artist in question has a very ditsy and childlike image (as is quite common in South Korea, and not just for women), so it’s understandable that people would regard her a bit like a child even though she’s almost 30

Overwhelmingly for women, actually.

There’s a male artist who has also had a ton of plastic surgery, but unlike the female artist in question, he’s very public about it and has a healthy attitude about it.

Because maybe he doesn’t have the stupidly heavy pressure that women have?

And as for beauty standards, men are talked about in general just as much.

For celebrities-yes, because they’re celebrities. In real life? No. Hell no. Countless times shit like “you’re a girl, be careful not to hurt your face” “you’re a girl, don’t go out in the sun and get tanned” “you’re a girl, your skin is important” happens. I’ve never seen any of that happen to my brother, or the large number of male acquaintances that I’ve had.

In other words, you’re conflating Kpop as synonymous with Korean society and its culture and the way patriarchy works in Korean society, which isn’t true-yes, there are a lot of ways they influence each other but ultimately they’re not the same thing.

So why don’t you fuck off and go back to your shithole where you came from before you give ~omg expert opinions~ on misogyny in Korea :D

Did I say Korean society was kpop? No.

To be more specific, it was an analysis of human nature, gynocentricism, and a little bit of Korean society through the kpop subculture, so the scope is of course going to be a little narrow. I don’t pretend to know everything about Korean culture (or hell, even my own culture), but my observations were sound. You’ve started your argument by putting words into my mouth though, so this doesn’t look too good. (Technically you started by calling me a pissbaby, but we’ll ignore that~)

Alrighty, to start: I’m not sure if you’re aware, but South Korea has the highest plastic surgery rate in the world by quite a bit. Of course that doesn’t mean everybody and their uncle is going under the knife, but it’s still significant. Certainly significant to warrant the use of an elongated “huge” to describe it.

Moving on, 1). You say this, and yet female celebrities who’ve had plastic surgery aren’t moving any less albums. They’re not getting any less media appearances. They’re not selling any less concert tickets. It’s not affecting their success, so what are these “more severe repercussions” that you’re speaking of? Unless you actually say what the repercussions are, that statement is meaningless.

2). It’s certainly possible (and even likely) that the specific phrase “plastic surgery monster” is used to refer to women more often than men, and I never said it wasn’t. I simply stated that I could easily think of several instances (some of which are well known) in which men were referred to that way, and that that meant that this isn’t a problem that solely affects women, regardless of what the percentages may be.

Indeed, when one does a google image search of 성괴 it’s obvious that most of the results are women, but there are still men present on every page of the search. Counting the first 100 results, 80 of them were pictures of women, while 8 of them were men. The rest were things like cartoons and 3D game characters, so we’ll disregard those. 1 in 11 is small, but it’s far from “fucking tiny”. Even if it happens most often to women, the fact that it happens to men too means that it’s not misogyny, it’s just a problem that happens to affect more women than men.

As for those sites, that’s terrible! However, I have to ask: are you absolutely sure that it’s only men that do it, and not just an assumption you’re making? Human nature tends to show that women are much more likely to insult women than men are, regardless of cultural differences. I don’t see why Koreans would be much different, since they’re humans too. Either way, such sites are definitely a problem, I agree. Nobody should be subject to such ridicule by anybody.

3). You’re right, but that doesn’t make it misogyny. This image explains why:

(I’m not saying that this specific issue is misandry, since it obviously affects a significant number of women as well, but this is a good guide for any such situations that may arise)

Second round of numbers, 1). This is sort of true, but mostly to the extent that people in general have much stronger opinions about celebrities than they should. Nobody in their right mind actually thinks they own a celebrity, but that clearly doesn’t stop them from trying to tell them what to do anyway.

2). Women do tend to go through a harsher lens, this is definitely true. As I explained above though, it’d only be misogynistic if it was only women who are subject to this, not just a majority. The fact that men are also affected means that it’s not misogyny, it’s just a problem that affects more women than men.

Overwhelmingly for women, actually.

Hey now, I’ve got access to the same media play that you do. I’ve seen all those guys doing aegyo and acting like little kids and such. You can’t pull the wool over my eyes on this one! It’s definitely more common for women to behave this way, but it’s not uncommon for guys to do it too.

Because maybe he doesn’t have the stupidly heavy pressure that women have?

Perhaps. Or maybe it’s because he finds it easier to laugh with people than just to be laughed at.

I won’t doubt that women have more pressure to look good in the general population, but right now we’re talking about celebrities. Young celebrities, at that. The stakes are different; men also feel immense pressure to look good in the public eye.

For celebrities-yes, because they’re celebrities. In real life? No. Hell no. Countless times shit like “you’re a girl, be careful not to hurt your face” “you’re a girl, don’t go out in the sun and get tanned” “you’re a girl, your skin is important” happens. I’ve never seen any of that happen to my brother, or the large number of male acquaintances that I’ve had.

I said “talked about”. You’re speaking of “talked to”, which is entirely different. Treating young women like children seems to be a somewhat common problem in Korea, but that has little relevance to things like gossip.

Also, just to note: just because you’ve never seen something doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. It’s much more likely though that instead a man would be told to do things that are attributed to the male gender role, like to be chivalrous, or to take on excess responsibility. How many girls have you seen be told to “man up”? Probably none.

In other words, you’re conflating Kpop as synonymous with Korean society and its culture and the way patriarchy works in Korean society, which isn’t true-yes, there are a lot of ways they influence each other but ultimately they’re not the same thing.

This is an assumption you’ve made on your own. I’m well aware of the difference between a country’s entertainment industry and the actual country as a whole. The media of any country is a reflection of that country’s ideals on various levels, which gives a unique look into the thought processes and etc of that particular culture. Obviously it’s not a 100% accurate portrayal of day to day life, that would be boring to the people that actually live that day to day life. I’ve been studying how things portrayed in the media relate to the ideals and attitudes of the general public of a society for a while now; I’m not just taking it as a literal representation. I’m no expert, but I’ve gotten pretty good at it nonetheless.

As for “patriarchy”, Korea is a society in which women are allowed to run for political office, vote, have jobs, and head households. It may not be particularly common or even encouraged at this point, but it means that Korea is no longer patriarchal.

Honestly, all I can judge is by what I’ve observed and read/heard about, as well as by what other Koreans have told me, and you’re singing a pretty different tune than the other Koreans I know. So, what makes your word more reliable than theirs? Do you have some hard statistics to back your claims up or something? If you do, please don’t hold back. You’re gonna need them to pull your argument back up out of the ground.

So why don’t you fuck off and go back to your shithole where you came from before you give ~omg expert opinions~ on misogyny in Korea :D

Where to start?

but South Korea has the highest plastic surgery rate in the world by quite a bit.

http://www.isaps.org/files/html-contents/ISAPS-Procedures-Study-Results-2011.pdf

http://www.isaps.org/files/html-contents/Downloads/ISAPS%20Results%20-%20Procedures%20in%202010.pdf

Nope, it doesn’t.

Unless you actually say what the repercussions are, that statement is meaningless.

Like the dramatic increase in Anti-fans using it as an excuse to attack them? Like the way the replies on news sites go from “she’s so pretty” to “she’s so plastic?

and that that meant that this isn’t a problem that solely affects women, regardless of what the percentages may be.

This is actually really flawed as it disregards the systematical way women is treated vs. the small handful of men. And in the case of men, as I said again, it’s considered a bad thing because plastic surgery is inherently a woman’s thing in Korea. It’s marketed exclusively towards women, and while the number of men who do get them are rising the targeted people who are mocked are usually women. Which is why the male counterpart of this comic doesn’t exist.

Human nature tends to show that women are much more likely to insult women than men are, regardless of cultural differences

Setting how misogynistic this is aside, yeah, ilbe is mostly run by MRAs, so….

the fact that it happens to men too means that it’s not misogyny, it’s just a problem that happens to affect more women than men.

And that is called systematical sexism, which is rooted in misogyny. Also your so called graphic is false, as not only is your source one of the worse cases of “we all bleed red” shit I’ve ever seen, actually, women ARE rewarded for masculine behavior in Korea, which was actually the entire point of Miss A’s “I don’t need a man” i.e patriarchy likes to favor women who step out of feminine roles. However, women who do partake in feminine roles are mocked as (words from your mouth) “shallow” “plastic” etc.

Also the thing is when men aegyo, that’s considered something special. When women do it, it’s considered a default. It’s what we are expected to do, which is why women get the “why don’t you have any aegyo for your guy” question and men do not.

How many girls have you seen be told to “man up”? Probably none

Actually a lot. Actually acting too feminine is discouraged. Look up the stereotype of the 내숭쩌는 여자 or shit like that you come up with literally thousands of critiques.

I’m well aware of the difference between a country’s entertainment industry and the actual country as a whole.

The thing is though you keep conflating the two. You keep doing that. And it’s annoying as fuck to a person who’ve actually lived here for 20 odd years.

Treating young women like children seems to be a somewhat common problem in Korea,

And it’s not a common problem anywhere else? HA

Korea is a society in which women are allowed to run for political office, vote, have jobs, and head households. It may not be particularly common or even encouraged at this point, but it means that Korea is no longer patriarchal.

Patriarchy doesn’t mean “omg women aren’t allowed to do anything”. Patriarchy means that men take a central role in government, economics, head of the house, etc etc. Now let’s count the number of women we have as CEOs, politicians, etc. Surprisingly enough, not a lot. Korea is still a patriarchy, and I would argue that most of the world is.

Why don’t you take your suspiciously good English and westernized views and go find a better argument :D

Woah man because obviously no Korean can speak good English or have ~westernized views~ although most women that I have met and worked with and studied with have these views amirite?

So I’m suddenly not a real Korean, hmmm?

Dear Hanryufan: go fuck yourself.

HAHAHAHAHA - some of the highlights from one of the most seriously flawed arguments i’ve ever seen:

1) “…and that that meant that this isn’t a problem that solely affects women, regardless of what the percentages may be…Counting the first 100 results, 80 of them were pictures of women, while 8 of them were men. The rest were things like cartoons and 3D game characters, so we’ll disregard those. 1 in 11 is small, but it’s far from “fucking tiny”. Even if it happens most often to women, the fact that it happens to men too means that it’s not misogyny, it’s just a problem that happens to affect more women than men.”

2) “Human nature tends to show that women are much more likely to insult women than men are, regardless of cultural differences.”

3) “As I explained above though, it’d only be misogynistic if it was only women who are subject to this, not just a majority. The fact that men are also affected means that it’s not misogyny, it’s just a problem that affects more women than men.”

4) “As for “patriarchy”, Korea is a society in which women are allowed to run for political office, vote, have jobs, and head households. It may not be particularly common or even encouraged at this point, but it means that Korea is no longer patriarchal.”

apparently, if something happens to ANY man it all, it’s not misogynistic, it just means women are more affected by it. the fact that it happens at a much higher rate to women would of course NOT AT ALL be related to misogyny and sexism. riiiiight. just a coincidence that it happens at noticeably higher rates to women?? and apparently if ONLY ONE woman is allowed to run for political office, vote, have a job or head a household it’s NOT patriarchy! regardless of the fact that men dominate all levels of government and economic power, and women’s level of economic activity is substantially lower despite their higher level of education than their male counterparts? not patriarchy at allllll. the ridiculous logic would almost be hilarious if it wasn’t so painfully clear how seriously this person takes themself, as seen in exhibit b:

“I’ve been studying how things portrayed in the media relate to the ideals and attitudes of the general public of a society for a while now; I’m not just taking it as a literal representation. I’m no expert, but I’ve gotten pretty good at it nonetheless.”

maybe spend less time “studying how things portrayed in the media relate to the ideals of the general public of a society” and take some time out to do some logic exercises, eh?

Jun 18, 201377 notes
#BlackinAsia: The Glorification of White Crime → blackinasia.tumblr.com

southcarolinaboy:

iamabutchsolo:

Take a facet of crime, and then look at television shows/movies that feature those criminals as protagonists.

White mobs.

image

White pirates.

image

White serial killers.

image

White political corruption

image

White drug dealers

image

I mostly want to talk about this as a TV phenomenon, but pick a crime, any crime, and Western media has probably made a movie/TV series/play/etc. with a white person that romanticizes the criminal activity. No matter what, a white person can do whatever terrible crimes and still have a TV/movie fanbase that loves them.

When you see black or brown people committing crimes on screen, you are to see them thugs and criminal masterminds and people to be beat down.

When you see white people committing crimes on screen, you see a three-dimensional portrait of why someone might commit that crime, how criminals are people too, and how you should even love them for the crimes that they commit because they’re just providing for their families or they’ve wronged or they’re just people and not perfect. This is particularly a luxury given to white male characters, since there few white female criminals as protagonists.

If and of the above shows were about black or brown folks, there would be a backlash of (white) people claiming that TV and movies are romanticizing criminals and are treating them too much like heroes and that it will affect viewers and encourage violence and “thuggish” behavior. And yet fictional white criminals get to have a deep fanbase who loves these white criminals, receive accolades and awards, get called amazing television that portray the complexities of human nature. Viewers of these characters see past the atrocious crimes and into their humanity, a luxury that white characters always have while characters of color rarely do. The closest that mainstream TV has come to showing black criminals as main characters is probably The Wire, and even then, the criminals share equal screen time and equal status as main characters as the police trying to stop them.

The idea that crime can be so heavily romanticized and glorified to such a degree is undoubtedly a privilege given to white characters. The next time you hear someone talk about Dexter Morgan or Walter White in a positive way, it may be an opportunity to rethink how white people can always able to be seen as people no matter what they do, while everyone else can be boiled down to nothing but a criminal.

Excellent point, and as someone who was glorifying Captain Jack Sparrow just a few posts ago, I should reblog this, too.

Jun 18, 201311,972 notes
"입양은 윤리적, 공개적이어야" [인터뷰] 한국입양인과 결혼, 한국아이 입양한 케이트씨 → ohmynews.com

그녀는 한국입양인과 결혼했고 한국입양아를 키우고 있지만 지난해 8월부터 시행되고 있는 한국의 입양특례법을 지지하고 베이비박스를 반대하며 우리나라에서 해외입양이 좀 더 엄격하게 윤리적, 공개적으로 이루어지길 기대한다. 

hmmmm have mixed feelings about this one for many reasons….

Jun 18, 2013
#adoption #korea #adoptee rights #ethical adoption #unwed mothers
"미혼모엔 5만원, 고아원엔 105만원... 입양 권하는 한국" → ohmynews.com

- 한국정부와 국회에 미혼모 문제와 관련하여 하고 싶은 제안이나 권고가 있는가? 
“미혼모를 돕는 것은 곧 국가의 미래가 될 아동을 돕는 것이다. 아동을 돕는 것에 반대하는 사람이 있는가? 정부의 역할은 이들을 돕는 창의적 재원을 마련하고 운영하는 것이다. 지금 현재 입양기관에게 주는 재원을 친모에게 주라. 현재 한국에서는 편부모가 최저생계비 대상자일 때한에서만 한 아이 당 한 달 5만 원을 국가가 지원한다. 그러나 그 편부모가 생활고로 아이를 못 키우고 고아원에 보내면 그 고아원은 한 아이 당 한 달 105만 원에서 107만 원을 국가에서 지원받는다. 현재 한국은 입양을 사회구조적으로 권장하고 있다. 고아원에 주는 105만 원을 생모에게 주라. 그리고 아이는 상품이 아니라는 것을 명심하라.”

Jun 18, 20134 notes
#korea #adoption #jane jeong trenka #unwed mothers #adoptee rights #human rights #unwed mothers rights #kumfa
Jun 18, 20138 notes
#kumfa #adoptee rights #human library #adoption #korea #me
Jun 18, 20131,112 notes
Jun 17, 201314,899 notes

ok, i admit it. i miss jinwoo. he worked from thursday morning until 6am on friday and i left friday morning for a weekend trip to gyeongju with chaeyoung and her mom. in the meantime, he left on saturday for a business trip and won’t be back til wednesday. it’s 5am and i can’t sleep (admittedly part of that is because i’m editing my thesis but part of it is because i need his arm pillow) why does six days seem so long? it never felt that long before. what has happened to meeeeee?

Jun 17, 201315 notes
Jun 17, 20134,689 notes

ok, but seriously.

1) why does tumblr continue to unfollow people without my consent and why does it keep happening to the same blogs (just as an example, this has happened probably at least ten times with goawaywithjae) 

2) why does tumblr not give me alerts when certain blogs only (just as an example, one tumblr that i’ve noticed this concretely with is imnopicasso) like/comment/reblog?? i can only realize later if i am looking at a post itself and scroll the notes and happen to see it. 

whywhywhy

Jun 17, 201311 notes

i think when i go to get the hard-bound copies for my thesis to turn into the library, my profs, etc, i’m going to get an extra copy made just so i can burn it to ashes. then i’m going to throw it into the han river. i think that will be therapeutic. this shit is never-ending, i swear. 

Jun 17, 201319 notes
#grad student problems
Play
Jun 17, 2013274 notes
Jun 17, 201328 notes
#baekho

lookatthisfuckingcisgender:

awaitingtheapocalypse:

Being white doesn’t make you privileged. Being cisgender doesn’t make you privileged. Having an adequate amount of money doesn’t make you privileged.
Now having mental stability? By my book, that makes you privileged.
Don’t make any assumptions about anyone else’s life when you have never lived a day in their head. “Privileged” is just another one of those indefinitely undefinable and subjective words. Its meaning lies to you and to YOU only. Don’t let anyone tell you that you should be happy or unhappy or grateful or ungrateful or successful or poor or satisfied or unsatisfied with your life and your circumstances. We all have our own understanding of loss, pain and suffering. Don’t let anyone, especially some bigoted asswipes from a social networking site try to measure your experiences and worth. You are unique by your pain, your thoughts, your opinions and your experiences, because they are YOURS and yours alone. No chart or website can define how blessed you are. Only you.

this post is really inspirational as long as you live in an alternate universe where institutionalized oppression doesn’t exist

Jun 17, 2013112 notes
“This is the first time you have whites thinking they face more discrimination than blacks do,” said Camille Charles, a sociologist at the University of Pennsylvania who studies class and race. “You have people who have come to believe the system is set up to benefit black people at the expense of white people.” Such beliefs, she said, reflect ignorance about the persistence of discrimination, about how much harder minorities were hit by the Great Recession, and about how affirmative action actually works (many incorrectly conflate “affirmative action” with “racial quotas,” which the Supreme Court long ago ruled unconstitutional).” —Dr. Camille Charles (via unapproachableblackchicks)
Jun 17, 2013101 notes
“‎’Slut’ is attacking women for their right to say yes. ‘Friend Zone’ is attacking women for their right to say no.” —And “bitch” is attacking women for their right to call you out on it (via dearscience)
Jun 17, 2013185,549 notes
Jun 17, 2013100,380 notes

you know what i find interesting is sometimes i get asks (and see others who get asks) that say, i had to unfollow you because of _______. usually pertaining to something i reblogged about white privilege or white supremacy. but they say it like, i should know that i crossed a line and therefore, i lost them as a follower. what they don’t seem to realize is that’s at least one of the reasons i reblog posts like those. to weed out the lost causes.

Jun 17, 201339 notes
This... is White Privilege: “I’m white and-“ “This blog is racist cause-“ “You’re hurting your... → thisiswhiteprivilege.tumblr.com

thisiswhiteprivilege:

  • “I’m white and-“
  • “This blog is racist cause-“
  • “You’re hurting your cause by-“
  • “You’re just as bad!”
  • “But I’m white and this happened to me too!”

ahem

I don’t care.


Seriously where are all these people coming from? It’s like the summer pests have come in the house. Guess we’ll…

Jun 17, 2013138 notes
the 군가산점 shitstorm

ecue:

if you’re a korean male and your dad isn’t rich and powerful, chance are you will have to do mandatory service for about two years (depending on which branch of the military you wind up in). monthly pay for corporals (about a year into your service) these days is about 100,000 won. assuming a highly unrealistic 40 hour work week, this amounts to an hourly pay of about 625 won. (about $0.54) admittedly, this is a huge raise since my time in the army (in 1999), but you get my point. and a significant part of the guys conscripted thusly are made to serve as one of korea’s many many many riot police units. getting have-nots to kettle and crack open skulls of other have-nots makes perfect sense. plus, the two years spent there usually coincide with what should be the most important period for ‘accumulating human capital’. 

so naturally, some korean males like to gripe about this - and their first target is almost always women. what should be a discussion about state oppression and slave-like labor devolves into a flame war between sexes. then there’s the 군가산점, a system of credit points given to those who served when applying for government positions. but korea already being a male-dominated society, this would further put disadvantage women than they already are - so it was ruled unconstitutional in 1999. now the ruling saenuri party wants to bring the system back. 

further adding (but probably not contributing) to this is the recent news of Norway’s recent decision to conscript women as well. some women think this is a way to break into the society-wide ‘boys club’, making way for actual equality. 

i think the whole issue is a smokescreen. i’m pretty sure the saenuri party knows that with already low economic activity rates, pulling 20-something females from education or productive activity and making them shovel shit for two years is a no-go. but they can always rely on this issue to drive a wedge between men and women to preoccupy themselves, while they degrade pay and jobs for everyone and pull shit like the NIS scandal. even more insidiously, they come up with other systems of ‘compensation’ for females which are almost always tied to their functionality as baby-making machines. like the ‘엄마 가산점’ system proposed by saenuri lawmaker 신의진. this reeks of the classic fascist ideal of ‘men defending the fatherland / women producing soldiers’ and fits in nicely with korea’s traditional adoration=oppression of the holy duty of motherhood. it reminds me of shit like the cross of honor of the german mother.

Jun 16, 201337 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December